Yes, I see what you mean! Perfact photographs without resorting to post processing is not getting any easier in this crowded world...I often stop and think...should I take this, knowing it is not ideal...car in teh wrong place, sun too high in the sky, cloud formation not what I really want...but life is so short, I just go ahead and shoot anyway!Remko":2stke7h3 said:Eny!
First one is great, nice quiet atmosphere. With this view, why bother with the gold?
Second one is too cluttered for my taste due to the speedboats.
Any specific reason why the ISO is at 250?
Hmmmm....curious! When I check the DNG original in Picasa, it still shows ISO 80...so as you say, it must be corrupting the EXIF data during export...I noticed that the boat 'explosion' also shows ISO 250 so it is at least consistent!odklizec":1ar9ewbw said:Andy, this time it's really not the forum EXIF reader what's wrongI examined the photos and their EXIF really says ISO250. But because the EXIF is unusually short in both files, it could be that the Picasa did something wrong with ISO tag? Could you please check the original files?