GR User Forum

The spot for all Ricoh GR camera users

Register for free, meet other Ricoh GR users, share your images, help others, have fun!

Tell your friends about us!

M mount module lens compatibility

Tom Caldwell

New Member
Has anyone found a link to the list of non-compatible lenses that Ricoh were going to produce for the M mount module?

I can understand that they might have other things to do in the meantime.

Meanwhile I think it is safe to assume that it is only some collapsible and "other oddball" lenses that will not fit. I am guessing that the list will not be huge and that most commonly used lenses will be fine.

I suggest that most early adopters of the module will soon enough be passing their lens stocks through the little test device.

In the usual spirit of co-operation I am sure they will pass on their ticks and crosses for the common benefit of others.

Perhaps Pavel can help moderate some sort of user-driven reporting system?

Even just on this thread might do but it might get messy.

Most interesting is the lenses that simply do not mount rather than the very large list of "is ok".

Tom
 
Hi Tom,

I'm definitely planning to add an M mount section for user lens reviews so virtually anyone would be able to post their experiences with various lenses.

As for the official M mount lens compatibility list, it's not available yet. I will be advised when it is available, but I guess this will not happen before the official camera availability.
 
odklizec":r7e4kmsl said:
Hi Tom,

I'm definitely planning to add an M mount section for user lens reviews so virtually anyone would be able to post their experiences with various lenses.

As for the official M mount lens compatibility list, it's not available yet. I will be advised when it is available, but I guess this will not happen before the official camera availability.

I did not think you would miss out on an M mount section. (smile)

I still think that virtually all M mountable lenses must fit otherwise "why bother?". However the fact that they have produced a measuring frame struck me with a moment of horror thinking perhaps that quite a number might not fit and we are back to the position of all other EVIL type and dslr cameras where a good number of quite desirable M and LTM wide angle lenses simply cannot be mounted on anything other than a genuine Leica or clone clone body. So the internal dimensions of the Ricoh M mount module are as important as the many other features that Ricoh had to get right.

As the demand for wide angle lenses is huge it would be a pity if users were denied the ability to use such greats as the Russian Jupiter-12 35mm f2.8 which has a 20mm rear protrusion behind the flange. All biogon designs will have similar problems.

Therefore we still don't know but the first thing I will be wanting to know is whether or not the J-12 will actually fit because if it does then most other lenses with rear protrusions will fit also.

I also believe that to exclude many of these lenses would place the Ricoh M mount module in much the similar position of any other camera with a dumb M mount adapter. Surely this was not what Ricoh was all about and wasting so much time and effort developing what is in effect a modern M mount camera in aps-c format.

The more lens types excluded then the less relevant the M mount module might be. This might explain why Ricoh has not already produced a list of "will not fit" lenses. They simply do not think there will be many but cannot exclude the possibility.

I have rationalised that this is the case and Ricoh have simply produced their measing device (dip stick?) so that owners might be warned to first test their lens in it lest a collapsible (for example) lens impact on the sensor and cause an expensive repair bill. Be cautious rather than sorry. If this is the case then I am quietly optimistic that my wide lenses will fit as to think otherwise is a sorry story indeed.

However the question mark for many will hang heavily over the M mount module until some lens fitting compatibility facts are listed, not all are as adventurous (stupid?) with their money as I am.

I have a number of lenses with rear protrusions to test including the Jupiter-12, already mentioned, but also the Orion-15, Russar MP-2 and Ricoh's own GR-28 (surely it will fit!). Also collapsible - the Leica Summitar and Industar-22.

Of these I am hopeful that they will all work as long as the collapsible ones are not collapsed. If there is a problem I am already thinking of making up a neat looking slip collar to prevent the collapsible lenses being collapsed when used.

I have horror visions of someone using their GXR with a collapsible lens installed. Someone says "hey neat camera, what make is it? A Leica?" You reply "no it's a Ricoh, want a look?".

Impressed stranger looks at it, starts fiddling with the lens twist and pulls, and before you can say "stop!" has delatched the lens and smartly retracted it into the camera. "Oops!" he says, then grins sheepishly and hands the camera back ....
 
When I remember well, the 21mm Super Angulon M has a huge back barrel. This lens is shown already in GXR blogs and delivers impressive test photographs.
Works very well, I guess. In case of Leica M bodies this lens isn't fully compatible in terms of exposure meter usage due to conflicts between back barrel and light sensor of some M models, especially M5?

For me it's really impressive to see how sensitive and capable the design team of Ricoh designed the module for the M bajonett. It's not only the delicate register distance but also the inboard treatment of the files especially in terms of wide and super wide angle lenses.
Even Leica denied the possibility to store lens datas manually into the M8 8.2 to earn more money for their lenscoding and as a second goal to protect their lens sales against third party manufacturers. So, from my side a big "Chapeau" to Ricoh!
 
silverbullet":pgvb74zw said:
When I remember well, the 21mm Super Angulon M has a huge back barrel. This lens is shown already in GXR blogs and delivers impressive test photographs.
Works very well, I guess. In case of Leica M bodies this lens isn't fully compatible in terms of exposure meter usage due to conflicts between back barrel and light sensor of some M models, especially M5?

For me it's really impressive to see how sensitive and capable the design team of Ricoh designed the module for the M bajonett. It's not only the delicate register distance but also the inboard treatment of the files especially in terms of wide and super wide angle lenses.
Even Leica denied the possibility to store lens datas manually into the M8 8.2 to earn more money for their lenscoding and as a second goal to protect their lens sales against third party manufacturers. So, from my side a big "Chapeau" to Ricoh!

I guess it is hard to get 100% compatibility - the exact meaning of M mount cannot be forced on every lens designer and camera bodies are in the province of another team entirely. We can only hope for the best for our favourites. meanwhile the sooner we get some sort of database together - either from Ricoh or self-created by users then we will all be the wiser.

Meanwhile I find it hard to buy LTM-M mount adapters without lens coding being already applied - chapeau or not the aftermarket has had it covered. I presume that any lens coding on the adapter is simply ignored by the M mount module.

So the 21mm Super Angulon M with huge back barrel fits? That at least is encouraging.

Tom
 
Hi
I am new to this forum and would appreciate some advice from the more senior members.

I am planning on buying the m module to complement the 28mm module and the 50mm, and the two zoom modules I already have. The zooms were the first two modules I bought, but hardly use now as I much prefer the prime lenses. I have ordered a second hand Leica tele elmarit 90mm lens which will give me an effective telephoto 135mm but was wondering about a wide angle lens for landscape photography. I really love wide lenses and using the hyperfocal distance, but live in Australia and often need to use a polarizing filter and I quite like adding ND filters for long exposures of water.

I was wondering about a suitable lens for the m module. I am probably can't afford a really expensive Leica lens or Zeiss distagon lens and have been looking at the voigtlander 12 mm ultrawide heliar, which would become an 18mm lens and can take an adaptor for filters, but unfortunately 77mm filters.

My questions are:
-has anyone any experience with this lens...vignetting etc
-is a lens with a 77mm filter attached going to be a ridiculous size for the gxr?
-any other suggestions for lenses? (I looked at the voigtlander 15mm which does take 55mm screw on filters, but that would equate to almost 22.5 mm and therefore not far off the 24mm zoom, albeit a better quality lens but max aperture of 4.5)

I do realise I have champagne tastes on a beer budget and may just have to save up!!!
 
pattyadams":3qe5p5yq said:
Hi
I am new to this forum and would appreciate some advice from the more senior members.

I am planning on buying the m module to complement the 28mm module and the 50mm, and the two zoom modules I already have. The zooms were the first two modules I bought, but hardly use now as I much prefer the prime lenses. I have ordered a second hand Leica tele elmarit 90mm lens which will give me an effective telephoto 135mm but was wondering about a wide angle lens for landscape photography. I really love wide lenses and using the hyperfocal distance, but live in Australia and often need to use a polarizing filter and I quite like adding ND filters for long exposures of water.

I was wondering about a suitable lens for the m module. I am probably can't afford a really expensive Leica lens or Zeiss distagon lens and have been looking at the voigtlander 12 mm ultrawide heliar, which would become an 18mm lens and can take an adaptor for filters, but unfortunately 77mm filters.

My questions are:
-has anyone any experience with this lens...vignetting etc
-is a lens with a 77mm filter attached going to be a ridiculous size for the gxr?
-any other suggestions for lenses? (I looked at the voigtlander 15mm which does take 55mm screw on filters, but that would equate to almost 22.5 mm and therefore not far off the 24mm zoom, albeit a better quality lens but max aperture of 4.5)

I do realise I have champagne tastes on a beer budget and may just have to save up!!!

I'm not all that senior, being under 40, but I do own and shoot a CV 12/5.6 in LTM. I like it a lot, except for portraiture and close ups, where the wide perspective distorts all to heck. I have never shot it on a digital Leica. There are several images of the 12mm and 15mm used on the Epson RD-1 here:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/ ... ?p=1472138
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/ ... ?p=1532706

There also lots of images of the lens used on an M8 to be found on the net.

The lens is deeply rear projecting, as is the 15mm, which I also own. I am not certain whether the M-module takes these lenses; wait till you know for sure. However, if you think of the M-module like a Leica M8.3 or an Epson RD-2, then it should fit.

However, I don't really recommend you buy the M-module to shoot ultra-wide lenses as wides. You're better off buying a FF camera to shoot wides as wides, or a crop frame with a crop frame lens that gives equivalent wide focal lengths, or stick to your Ricoh A12 module in 28mm.

If you have already committed to the ultrawide Voigts, then I recommend quickly contacting Stephen Gandy to buy the 12 ($249) and 15mm ($169) finders for the RD-1, which are long discontinued but still in stock for now.
 
The jury is still out on whether old manual slr lenses will be practical on the M mount module. I prefer to refer to it unofficially as the GXR-M for shorthand.

I have a Canon FD 20mm f2.8 lens which I use very successfully on a Samsung NX10 with FD mount adapter.

FD to M mount adapters are sold by Novoflex and Rayqual but are more expensive than a FD 20mm lens (if you make a lucky lens purchase). However I found Antonio Lolli's site via a link provided by Pavel and have bought both a FD and PK adapters to M mount made by Voigtlander for about half the price required by the other makers. These lenses are currently being shipped to Australia from Italy. I have not seen them listed anywhere else.

I do think that workable lenses will be found by trial and error through the auspices of early GXR-M owners. My contribution is more likely to be the trialing of a number of Russian LTM lenses and also some of the M42 variety. However I would recommend that buying Russian lenses is not something for the novice (if you are) or the faint-hearted. I have some very good ones and some that I need to work on a bit, mostly re-lubrication of internal grease that has gone sticky and/or hard. However the Russian lenses are relatively cheap and the price is more driven by number available. For example the Industar 61L/D is a very good lens but very cheap AUD$16-24 plus freight simply because they literally made millions of them. On the other hand the Orion-15 is a fair enough lens but not that much relatively better that it justifies a price of mid-high $200's but it is comparatively rare and the price adjusts accordingly. Likewise the Jupiter-8 is a very attractive Ziess Sonnar clone and nice black one could be had for less than $80 which is a whole lot cheaper than the modern Ziess equivalent. The Jupiter-12 has a huge reputation (good) but may not fit in the GXR-M as it has a large rearward protrusion of the lens. It will be regarded as a classic if it really will work and fit - the prices of good J-12's have been rising for some reason as currently they will not adapt to any EVIL type camera or even a dslr. Maybe I am not the only person taking a position with that lens.

Several months ago I knew nothing about Russian lenses but in between I have learned quite a lot. Best leave something for another post.
 
Thanks ZDP for the reply. luckily I havent committed to a wide angle voigtlander. I shall check out those sites you mentioned, but I think you are right and I may have to be content with my 28mm, but I just wondered if there were any lenses I hadn't heard of. Maybe Ricoh will bring out a dedicated wide angle for the gxr ;)
By the way I apologize...I meant senior in terms of experience not age :oops:
 
Hi pattyadams and welcome here! The next planned A12 lens is wide zoom with short tele. From the Ricoh module road map published last year, it looks it will start under 28mm (24mm) and end above 72mm (90mm?). Check it out:

Some skeptical people (on another forum) say it will not be released this year. But from what I know, there has not been announced any delay or postponement! And because aside the M mount, there should be released another two new cameras in a very short period of time (CX6, and GRDIV), I think it's safe to assume the A12 zoom will be available just before the Christmas (as was the A12 50 or A12 28) ;)

As for the CV lenses, aside the 12/5.6, there is also very nice 15/4.5. You can read about it and see some pics here:
http://ricoh-gr-diary.blogspot.com/2011 ... .html#more

And I'm definitely planning to give a try some cheap russian/korean wide (fisheye) lenses ;) For example, this Zenitar 16/2.8 does not look so hopelessly:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/zenit/zenitar-16mm.htm
Of course, not as good as other primes. But it will give you very usable 24/2.8 at very low price, especially if you stop it down a bit.
 

Attachments

  • GXR-roadmap.jpg
    EXIF
    GXR-roadmap.jpg
    51.6 KB · Views: 1,355
Thanks Odklizec....the potential new A12 certainly looks interesting. I shall look out for news on that one. Is there any information on its aperture range?
 
I'm afraid, not yet. Judging from the assumed zoom range (and if I'm very optimistic), my guess is something f2.5-f4.0? But if the lens should not be too big or mediocre image quality, my other guess is f2.8-f5.6. We will see ;)
 
I have not noticed anyone say if the M lenses focus properly on the module, ie lens flange to sensor distance being proper and the lenses focus at the correct distance, not past inj. y/n? Sorry if this has been answered before.

wbill
 
Tom Caldwell":3fj0iza8 said:
This crazy says manual zoom for M mount, small and serviceable. But then I am crazy ... right?
I'm sure the Zoom module provided by Ricoh will be AF-based. I seriously doubt Ricoh will introduce any manual lens for M mount. As far as I know, there are no plans to introduce any new Ricoh M mount lens, not even reintroduction of old Ricoh-Leica lenses.
 
agfa100":su2pnrdn said:
I have not noticed anyone say if the M lenses focus properly on the module, ie lens flange to sensor distance being proper and the lenses focus at the correct distance, not past inj. y/n? Sorry if this has been answered before.

wbill
The M mount module flange distance is exactly the same as in Leica M cameras, so the M lenses should focus exactly the same as on other M mount cameras (of course, aside the rangefinder focusing). Even the Infinity focus should be maintained. The only difference should be the focal length and DoF, due to the 1.5 crop factor given by the ASPC sensor.
 
odklizec":35gtpj0h said:
Tom Caldwell":35gtpj0h said:
This crazy says manual zoom for M mount, small and serviceable. But then I am crazy ... right?
I'm sure the Zoom module provided by Ricoh will be AF-based. I seriously doubt Ricoh will introduce any manual lens for M mount. As far as I know, there are no plans to introduce any new Ricoh M mount lens, not even reintroduction of old Ricoh-Leica lenses.

Yes I know, but I could not help mentioning it ... I am not after a auto focus zoom module, do cross me off that list, but I might have been interested in a compact fast manual one. But I know that I am the only one singing off key.

So it is going to be auto-focus largish, fairly slow, really well built and A12 forever. It is a fairly short zoom though? (brightens).

Not one of those that focus from your kids smile right through to forever ... They are the big heavy ones usually.

Tom
 
There is a very expensive "zoom" solution from Leica:

Wide angle TRI-Elmar, starting with 16mm 18mm 21mm (in steps only) and the old and discontinued TRI-ELMAR 28 35 50mm (in steps only). Both in F4. The latter exists in two version. Version No.1 had some mechanical problems inside the very complicate lens barrel.
 
I heard Ricoh engineers saying the only lens it won't work with is the Elmar-C 1:4/90, but that's a CL lens.

Sorry Gerd, just kidding ;)
 
There was a photograph on a Chinese blog of a 21mm Super Anguillon fitted to a GXR-M. I am not familiar with this lens but believe that it has a significant rear protrusion. If this is so then there is hope yet.

With some good grace and luck I might be the first to test out the Jupiter-12 on the GXR-M. As previously mentioned the Jupiter-12 35mm f2.8 is one of the best regarded Russian lenses on film but it's rear protrusion of about 20mm renders it's use on anything other that a Leica body or a near clone problematic. It simply will not fit on EVIL type cameras that use adapters, nor dslr/slr because it interferes with the mirror action.

However in recent months there has been a steady market in J-12's which must either be a few would-be GXR-M owners like myself taking a gamble or some deeply renewed interest by M9 owners in this Ziess Biogon clone that surely must still be a bargain if it does in fact work (in any camera).

Otherwise it makes a very pretty paperweight. It surely is a good looking lens if nothing else.
 
Back
Top