odklizec
PK
As usually, the Japanese DC.Watch.Impress web brings us the first comprehensive R10 photo test.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/revie ... /9271.html
Here you can see their previous R8 test...
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/revie ... /8298.html
It's very interesting to compare both tests, even thought the camera settings and conditions are quite different. It seems to me, that R10 works significantly better at ISO64-400. Definitely less aggressive sharpening and less burned highlights. But we would need better head-to-head test to see the real differences.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/revie ... /9271.html
Here you can see their previous R8 test...
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/revie ... /8298.html
It's very interesting to compare both tests, even thought the camera settings and conditions are quite different. It seems to me, that R10 works significantly better at ISO64-400. Definitely less aggressive sharpening and less burned highlights. But we would need better head-to-head test to see the real differences.