ZDP-189
New Member
I'm a value buyer. I don't like the idea of being bent over a store counter and reamed every time I buy a camera. I suppose that's because I have a tendency to accumulate cameras and otherwise I'd have to sell some. Anyway, I do a lot of research and I know both new and second hand market prices so I can spot a good deal when I see one.
So last night I bought a GRD I in Hong Kong on the recommendation of Ricoh forum members. I'm not ready to say that it's better than my GRD III, but I was surprised at how well it performed. It doesn't look, feel and shoot like it's generations behind. certainly it doesn't deserve its pricing. When I started looking just weeks ago, the second hand store price was $220, then $190 and when I finally reached for the cash it had fallen to $130 for a bare camera and battery. At a different store I got a second hand but minty GX200 in a crisp full box for $225. I couldn't pass it up. When I bought my first digital Ricoh, a GX100+VF-1 (second hand boxed) it cost me about $350. After Christmas the going rate for a second hand boxed GRD III was $475, but at the beginning of the month I managed to snag a mint boxed GRD III for under $310. The GRD III and GX200 should be a big premium over the GX100, so that should only be around the $140-$180 mark today, if that.
Please don't make me any offers; I've no intention of selling. Why? Because it doesn't make any sense to me. Ricoh's are a bit different to other brands and shouldn't really devalue in the same way. As I said, the shootability and results hasn't really changed that much over the recent years and I can still get a better photo with an first generation Ricoh than many of the latest consumer cameras will give you with their so called 'intelligent auto' modes and auto flash. Ricoh's have a more or less bulletproof plasticoated magnesium bodies and they all take the same generic lithium batteries and even triple-A's. So in years to come, when the original batteries are dead, you can still shoot them. I learned this was a big deal when collecting cameras - those with dead coupled selenium meters, discontinued mercury batteries and discontinued film stock are paperweights. Also with the use of Alkaline batteries, I can leave them all over the place as standby cameras. I won't get many shots out of them but what other digital will take batteries that will still be good to go in years' time?
So here I am looking at the space in what has not become a collection a missing GRD II and thinking - heck, this is getting expensive! I may be a value buyer, but I didn't say I was entirely rational. :lol:
So last night I bought a GRD I in Hong Kong on the recommendation of Ricoh forum members. I'm not ready to say that it's better than my GRD III, but I was surprised at how well it performed. It doesn't look, feel and shoot like it's generations behind. certainly it doesn't deserve its pricing. When I started looking just weeks ago, the second hand store price was $220, then $190 and when I finally reached for the cash it had fallen to $130 for a bare camera and battery. At a different store I got a second hand but minty GX200 in a crisp full box for $225. I couldn't pass it up. When I bought my first digital Ricoh, a GX100+VF-1 (second hand boxed) it cost me about $350. After Christmas the going rate for a second hand boxed GRD III was $475, but at the beginning of the month I managed to snag a mint boxed GRD III for under $310. The GRD III and GX200 should be a big premium over the GX100, so that should only be around the $140-$180 mark today, if that.
Please don't make me any offers; I've no intention of selling. Why? Because it doesn't make any sense to me. Ricoh's are a bit different to other brands and shouldn't really devalue in the same way. As I said, the shootability and results hasn't really changed that much over the recent years and I can still get a better photo with an first generation Ricoh than many of the latest consumer cameras will give you with their so called 'intelligent auto' modes and auto flash. Ricoh's have a more or less bulletproof plasticoated magnesium bodies and they all take the same generic lithium batteries and even triple-A's. So in years to come, when the original batteries are dead, you can still shoot them. I learned this was a big deal when collecting cameras - those with dead coupled selenium meters, discontinued mercury batteries and discontinued film stock are paperweights. Also with the use of Alkaline batteries, I can leave them all over the place as standby cameras. I won't get many shots out of them but what other digital will take batteries that will still be good to go in years' time?
So here I am looking at the space in what has not become a collection a missing GRD II and thinking - heck, this is getting expensive! I may be a value buyer, but I didn't say I was entirely rational. :lol: