Tom Caldwell
New Member
I have never felt that I needed a lcd screen protector cover on my Ricoh cameras. My aging GRD, R4 and somewhat lesser used GX100 have had their lcd screens unblemished in normal use over a good period of time. No after market screen covers were fitted and I have not found them necessary.
I now have a GRDIII and GXR body. The GRDIII showed an apparent scratch some time ago which I put down to my own stupid carelessness. Then it got a few more. My GXR seemed fine for a while but then I started to notice a surface "crazing" consisting of very fine lines and scratches in multiple directions. It has become very ugly to look at. It might take 18-24 months of fairly regular use for this problem to become so endemic as to be easily noticed, but once noticable it soon starts to drive you crazy as you get it "in your face" every time you use the camera.
Others have noted that the anti-glare film covering is a softer film and is easily scratched but I had been lulled into a false sense of security by my earlier trouble free experiences. Now I have two camera bodies with lcd surfaces that look somewhat tawdry and unprofessional. All the more so that they perform most excellently (including the lcd screens themself) and have every indication of lasting a long time and giving great enjoyment.
Obviously I now know that an lcd covering is very essential but it is a bit too late to be considering covering over the mess that has developed. Of course the screens underneath are perfect as already noted, it is just the anti-glare surface covering that has been damaged.
A couple of problems that are not going to go away by themself.
My advice is that Ricoh should not distribute any camera with this type of anti-glare covering without a hard over-covering that will withstand the rigours of normal use. Or at the very least noting that fitting an lcd screen protector is mandatory.
Furthermore - does anyone know if the GRDIV lcd screen is properly protected ex-works? Or are owners simply waiting for the problem to re-surface?
Tom
I now have a GRDIII and GXR body. The GRDIII showed an apparent scratch some time ago which I put down to my own stupid carelessness. Then it got a few more. My GXR seemed fine for a while but then I started to notice a surface "crazing" consisting of very fine lines and scratches in multiple directions. It has become very ugly to look at. It might take 18-24 months of fairly regular use for this problem to become so endemic as to be easily noticed, but once noticable it soon starts to drive you crazy as you get it "in your face" every time you use the camera.
Others have noted that the anti-glare film covering is a softer film and is easily scratched but I had been lulled into a false sense of security by my earlier trouble free experiences. Now I have two camera bodies with lcd surfaces that look somewhat tawdry and unprofessional. All the more so that they perform most excellently (including the lcd screens themself) and have every indication of lasting a long time and giving great enjoyment.
Obviously I now know that an lcd covering is very essential but it is a bit too late to be considering covering over the mess that has developed. Of course the screens underneath are perfect as already noted, it is just the anti-glare surface covering that has been damaged.
A couple of problems that are not going to go away by themself.
My advice is that Ricoh should not distribute any camera with this type of anti-glare covering without a hard over-covering that will withstand the rigours of normal use. Or at the very least noting that fitting an lcd screen protector is mandatory.
Furthermore - does anyone know if the GRDIV lcd screen is properly protected ex-works? Or are owners simply waiting for the problem to re-surface?
Tom