Thank you, very nice and informative.Hi,
what are you interested in, with this comparison?
I can say, that the GT-2 delivers superb quality. It´s the same resolution like the 50mm crop and give you at the same quality 75mm focal length. If you crop without the GT-2 to 75mm angle of view, you`ll loose a lot of pixels.
I posted last year a comparison with GR II, GR IIIx and GW-4 and GT-2 in another forum. I hope it is OK, to post the link here.
Comparison of GR II and GR IIIx with different converter lenses (in German)
(If not, the Admin please feel free to remove it.)
Yes, the Crop unfortunately reduces the resolution of the Raw-Files, too.Thank you, very nice and informative.
I know to read in German, but writing is not anymore good, so forgive me for it.
The 75mm crops the image to about 15-16mpix according to Ricoh, even on Raw format?
Have you tried to block the contacts of the adapter so the camera doesn't know the lens is there and would give the full resolution and a 60mm lensview?
Would the GT2 be usable on the regular GR III (would it give a 35-40-45mm or similar fov on it?) camera or perhaps even the GR II camera?
Would this interfere with the focusing and mess that up somehow?
Hi,Thank you for the link, very interesting.
I'm interested in two things:
1. One thing is the resolution, the other the sharpness of the lens. The 40 mm lens projects the image at a certain sharpness on the sensor. How does this image cropped to 71 mm compare to the sharpness of the image the TC projects on the sensor? (One could reduce deliberately the resolution when taking the picture with TC to 7 MP...)
2. How are the differences in "flattening" the image and how does the bokeh differ, when shooting at 2.8