D dgilmour New Member Feb 19, 2011 #1 [No message] Attachments EXIF IMG_3681.jpg 239.4 KB · Views: 360
D dgilmour New Member Feb 20, 2011 #3 Thank you! The only disappointing thing on this shot is the visible banding on the background because it was underexposed even at ISO 800.
Thank you! The only disappointing thing on this shot is the visible banding on the background because it was underexposed even at ISO 800.
odklizec PK Feb 20, 2011 #4 Yeah, I noticed the banding. It's interesting (but disappointing) to see such a thing at that "low" ISO. A12 50 module also suffered from banding, but it was noticeably only in the initial versions of the FW and only in ISO3200 shots.
Yeah, I noticed the banding. It's interesting (but disappointing) to see such a thing at that "low" ISO. A12 50 module also suffered from banding, but it was noticeably only in the initial versions of the FW and only in ISO3200 shots.
D dgilmour New Member Feb 20, 2011 #5 I think it can appear even at lower ISO in significantly underexposed shots (like this one) when you try to correct exposure to "normal" values.
I think it can appear even at lower ISO in significantly underexposed shots (like this one) when you try to correct exposure to "normal" values.